shivver: (DT absolute radio)
[personal profile] shivver
This worked so well the last time, here's another "please identify the image". Does anyone know where this image comes from and/or if there's a non-filtered and non-cut-off version of it somewhere? Thanks!

Date: 2016-09-22 08:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tkel-paris.livejournal.com
The numb reaction we got at first felt in-character to me and spoke volumes about how deeply the Doctor cared for Donna. He was stuck in the "I sent her away, and she's dead because of me" mode. And I think he might've sunk into a fatal depression (namely, being eaten) had River not dragged him. However, later I thought he should've snapped harder at River for her reaction. In fact, Moffat's poor choices in that episode led to me disliking River from the start. And he hasn't done much to change that. The only thing that for me makes River interesting is that Alex Kingston is a good actor and had done a great job with crappy scripts.

Oh, I need to figure this one out. It should be good. :DDDDD

Date: 2016-09-22 09:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shivver13.livejournal.com
I liked River in the Library. At the time, she was the efficient archaeologist with a mysterious past/future with the Doctor, and with the implication that she would one day marry the Doctor, she made me wonder what it was about her - about a human - that captivated the Doctor so much that he would marry her. I was especially hopeful of an interesting characterization of a female scientist.

And then when River reappeared, she was the typical Moffat "strong" woman, namely, older hip-swinging femme fatale, superior at everything, always one step ahead of the Doctor, and obsessed with him. (The other typical Moffat "strong" woman is the young pretty-but-tomboyish girl that yells at the Doctor a lot.) How that person became Library!River, I have no idea. I mean, really, River only became a scientist so that she could find out more about the Doctor.

She was not an interesting character. Her entire narrative purpose seemed to be to make the Doctor look like a fool. I never felt that she and the Doctor had any chemistry at all; it seemed to me that she bullied the Doctor into the relationship. And then the last Christmas special destroyed any respect I might have had for her.

And now we have Moffat doing the same thing with Missy: apparently, he feels that if a character is made female, she must only care about her relationship with the Doctor. Honestly, it's the problem I have with all of Moffat's major females - they are all defined by their relationships with the Doctor. Amy's childhood and development was defined by the Doctor, Clara was born to save the Doctor, River was conditioned to kill and then love the Doctor, Missy wants to be the Doctor's friend. Can we please have a female character who is an individual in her own right?

This is probably the entire reason why the only major character from Moffat's era that I really liked is Rory. He's male, so his history and personality is not dominated by the Doctor.

Sorry for the rant. :D
Edited Date: 2016-09-22 09:33 pm (UTC)

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     123
4567 8910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627 28 29 3031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 1st, 2026 11:11 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios